![]() |
|
| oHome > Subject Headings |
|
Two major systems of subject headings are used for maps: the Library of Congress subject headings, and the Boggs & Lewis subject headings. Library of Congress In a MARC record, the 650 Subject field is for topical names and the 651 field is reserved for Geographic Names. In regards to maps, Field 651 (Subject Added Entries - Geographical Names) can be used for the following Library of Congress subject headings: 1. Political jurisdictions on their own or subdivided by
subject terms. Political jurisdictions with a title are also considered corporate
names and should be indicated in the 610 field. 2. Natural features, such as bays, capes, rivers, mountains,
deserts, etc. 3. Geographical regions and celestial bodies, such as names
of continents, land masses, planets, stars, etc. 4. Archaeological sites. 5. Parks, neighborhoods. 6. Local place names, such as names of cities, towns, etc. Within the 651 field, subfields are used to indicate Library of Congress subject heading subdivisions, which are also based on authorized headings. Subfields $v, $x, and $z are repeatable. Subfields $v, $x, $y, and $z do not have to be in alphabetical order. "Maps" is an authorized subdivision within the ($v) bibliographic form division. This $v subdivision is not only used in the 651 field, but other fields such as the 650 field (Subject Added Term - Topical Term). "Maps" may also be added as a ($x) general subject subdivision. The subfield $v indicates that the item is in fact a map, whereas the $x subfield relates to a the subject of a map and is not in map format. Examples of the use of subdivisions in both the 650 and 651 fields include: e.g. 650 $a Postal zones $z Canada $v Maps. Whenever a cataloguer uses the subfield 651 or a geographic subdivision, he or she must use an 043 field using the code for that area from the US MARC Code List for Geographic Areas in subfield $a. The source of a local code in subfield $b is indicated in subfield $2. The source of codes used in subfield $c is ISO 3166 (Part 1 and Part 2). That any particular item is a map can also be indicated within field 245 (Title Statement). The subfield $h within the title statement of the item will indicate whether the item is a map as subfield $h is reserved for medium (general material designation). For example: 245 $a The map of Canadian legends. $h [cartographic material]. Boggs and Lewis
Boggs and Lewis devised their own list of subject headings.
Some of the subjects are taken or adapted from Library of Congress's 4th
edition of subject headings.
Others were created specifically for the Boggs and Lewis system, in situations
where the Library of Congress system was found to be inadequate to describe the subject of the cartographic
material. The Boggs & Lewis subject headings were completed in 1945 and
have never been officially revised. This lack of currency is one of the weaknesses
of the system. Those libraries that continue to use Boggs & Lewis must
update the subject headings themselves. An example provided by Boggs & Lewis is: The one exception to the precedence of geographic area is if the subject is in the Boggs & Lewis list of subject headings as an entry, not a subdivision. In such a case, two headings should be listed, the first with the geographic area first, and the second with the subject first. For example: Japan--Volcanoes--1929. Boggs, Samuel W., and Dorothy Cornwell Lewis. The Classification and Cataloging of Maps and Atlases. New York: Special Libraries Association, 1945. Library of Congress. "MARC 21 Concise Format for Bibliographic Data". In MARC Standards. 2004. Accessed March 15, 2005. <http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdhome.html>. Library of Congress. "Understanding MARC Bibliographic". In MARC Standards. December 2003. Accessed March 15, 2005. <http://www.loc.gov/marc/umb/um07to10.html>.
|
|||||||||||||
|
LIBR 517: Advanced Bibliographic Control: Subject Analysis
|