![]() A Thesaurus of Dog Show Obedience Terms |
![]() Photo
courtesy Express and Star
|
Dame Edna's Indexing LanguageIn this section, we describe the indexing language used for the construction of the Thesaurus of Dog Show Obedience terms. The following content is included: 1. Method and Rationale Method and RationaleOur thesaurus was compiled using the deductive method: the first step was to collect a sufficient number of terms, and the second step was to examine the selected terms in order to find structure and to introduce a controlled vocabulary of preferred terms. Terms were assigned hierarchically within broader categories (modules) or discarded as the topic focus narrowed, and analyzed again later. Following the Practical Manual recommendation, we turned to Multites only when all relationships had been established and finalized between terms. From our research we have determined that the terminology surrounding our topic (dog show obedience) would be organized into four large subject categories (modules). These are as follows: 1. Clubs For the first iteration of this project we
decided to develop only terms within the Shows module, but our
thesaurus has been designed to incorporate potential expansion at a
future date.
equivalence | hierachical | associative | node A thesaurus differs from unstructured vocabulary lists in that thesauri indicate the semantic relationship between terms by means of relationship indicators. The Thesaurus of Dog Show Obedience Terms displays three kinds of semantic relationships as defined in part 5.1 of the NISO guidelines. The three types of relationships are: equivalence relationships (section 5.2); Equivalence relationshipsIn an equivalence relationship, two or more terms represent the same or synonymous concept. Within this type of relationship, one term must be selected as the preferred term or descriptor. The non-preferred term(s) are cross-referenced to the preferred term. This type of relationship is of three basic types: a) synonyms, b) quasi-synonyms, and c) lexical variants. Reciprocity is indicated by the terms USE and USED FOR. The non-preferred term is indicated by the notation USE, followed by the preferred term. The preferred term takes the notation USED FOR, followed by the non-preferred term. A typographical distinction is made between preferred and non-preferred terms, as per Thesaurus Construction and Use (Aitchinson, et.al, 2000, F1.1 p. 50 ). Non-preferred terms are italicized in
the thesaurus.
In a hierarchical relationship, the level of subordination and superodination is shown, where the superodination descriptor represents a class, and the subordinate descriptor refers to its members. This basic relationship distinguishes the thesaurus from an unstructured term list, and is "an important factor in the improvement of recall and also of precision performance" (Aitchison, et al., 2000). The hierarchical relationship includes the generic relationship, the hierarchical whole-part relationship, the instance relationship, and the polyhierarchical relationship. Reciprocity is set out in the thesaurus using
the following conventions:
BT (broader Term) - a label for the subordinate descriptor
NT (narrower Term) - a label for the subordinate descriptor.
Associative relationships are found between preferred terms that are related conceptually but not hierarchically, and are neither equivalent nor hierarchical. As such, the relationship is symmetrical. Reciprocity between associative relationships
are indicated by an RT (related term) label between preferred terms in
the thesaurus.
Node labels are used to group related terms
within the thesaurus. These terms are not used as indexing terms and
can be found in enclosed brackets, e.g. < commands >.
In the world of show dogs, acronyms are often used for terms such as Best of Breed (BOB) and Best in Match (BIM). Both the acronym and the full term are considered correct usage. However, usage of the acronym indicates a level of inside knowledge that is most appropriate for the needs of the user. We have therefore chosen to use the acronym for the preferred term and applied them consistently throughout the thesaurus. Aitchison recommends: "The selection of preferred terms from among possible synonyms should always be influenced by the needs of the users of the thesaurus ... Every effort should be also made to find all appropriate non-preferred synonyms for the preferred terms, in order to enrich the entry vocabulary and with it the usefulness of the thesaurus as a recall improvement device." Following section 3.6.3.1 of the NISO standard
and Practical Manual recommendations, cross-references have been made
from the full forms to the acronyms as required.
Descriptors are displayed in lower-case
characters in most instances. Places where deviations were made include
initialisms (3.6.8) e.g. BIM, BOB, and dog show titles (3.6.8).
As compound and multiword terms are commonly
used in dog show literature, we have decided to use these terms as
single descriptors within the thesaurus. These terms are often times
ambiguous when split (4.2.a) e.g. "heel wide", or a part of a whole
(4.3.2.1) e.g. "bar jump".
In general we have followed the NISO guidelines in the use of singular and plural forms. Descriptors that fall under the "how many" rule (3.5.1) will be found in the plural form, e.g. orders, commands, and penalties. Descriptors that fall under the "how much" rule (3.5.2) will be found in the singular form, e.g. pacing. In many cases we chose singular forms based on
user warrant (3.6.1). For example, the descriptor "bar jump" would fit
under the "how many" rule as plural, but in all literature regarding
the descriptor it was used in the singular form. This is because the
term "Bar jump" cannot be represented by jumps in general because it is
a specific action or type of jump that dog performs. This term is known
and will be sought by our users as a "bar jump", and is therefore
stated in the thesaurus in its singular form.
All activities are represented by nouns or
gerunds in the thesauri. All verbal nouns have been converted to nouns
or gerunds (3.4.1.1).
"To obviate problems in filing and searching"
(3.7.2.2), we decided not to use hyphens unless it created ambiguity
for the term. For example, in the term "All Breed Top Ten", the hyphen
was omitted.
As per NISO recommendations (6.3.3), we chose italics to typographically distinguish nonpreferred terms in our thesaurus. Relationship indicators and preferred term acronyms have been indicated in capital letters. Descriptors (preferred terms) are expressed in bold type.
|