|
“This is not
science
fiction,” novelist Daniel Akst warns as he
recounts of yet another
technological innovation seemingly poised to damage the delicate egos
of
authors: Computers are capable of
writing both non-fiction and fiction prose. While
Henry James is not yet threatened, Akst
assures us, advances in
computing power and the study of narratology (i.e. narrative
structures) have
combined to help computer programmers move beyond fiction-writing
software that
assists the human author to develop plot lines, to the development of
programs
that allows computers to turn bytes into barbs.
Yes, but how good can these
computer authors really be? Read the
following two paragraphs and find out. See
if you can tell which one was written by a computer and which by a
human author:
1)
Dave Striver loved the university—its ivy covered clocktowers, its
ancient and
sturdy brick, and its sunsplashed verdant greens and eager youth. The university, contrary to popular opinion,
is far from free of the stark unforgiving trials of the business world: academia has its own tests, and some are as
merciless as any in the marketplace. A
prim example is the dissertation defense: to
earn the Ph.D., to become a doctor, one must pass
an oral examination
on one’s dissertation. This was a test
Professor Edward Hart enjoyed giving.
2)
The road to grandmother’s house led through the dark forest, but Little
Red
Riding Hood was not afraid and she went on as happy as a lark.
The birds sang her their sweetest songs while
the squirrels ran up and down the tall trees.
Now and then, a rabbit would cross her path.
|