As
countless traditionalists went into early mourning over
the book, hypertext authors began dancing on its grave. The
familiarity and stability of print that warmed the hearts of writers
like Gass was, in the opinion of this new generation of writers, a
stagnant, restrictive form and a relic from an authoritarian
past. By freeing themselves from the form of the book, moreover,
hypertext fiction writers similarly threw off the shackles of the
novel.
Robert Coover writes:
Much of the novel's alleged power is embedded in the line, that
compulsory
author-directed movement from the beginning of a
sentence to its
period, from the top of the page to the bottom, from
the first page
to the last.
But true freedom from the tyranny of the line is perceived as only
really possible
now at last with the advent of hypertext, written and
read on the
computer, where the line in fact does not exist unless one
invents and implants it in the
text.
Because hypertext fiction is not limited by physical or conceptual
boundaries, hierarchies of structure and linear narratives disappear,
thereby placing the reader at the helm of his or her own literary
journey. In this way, hypertext fiction seems to offer a more
accurate and democratic reflection of the individual’s experience of
reality rather than the artificial, controlled model of the
novel. With the reader able to control the narrative with the click of
the mouse, independent of any guidance, the role of the author also
becomes tenuous.
Having done away with print and the novel, will
technology similarly make authors obsolete?
|