Easy right? It’s obvious that number two
was written by a
computer. The prose in the first
paragraph consists of simple subject/verb/object sentence structures
and lacks
style whereas the second paragraph has more sentence variation and
sensory
imagery. Well, guess what?
They were both written by computer programs.
The first is
the work of the
program Brutus.1
developed by Selmer Bringsjord of Rensselaer
Polytechnic
Institute and David Ferucci of I.B.M. The
second was composed by Storybook, “an end-to-end
narrative prose
generation system that utilizes narrative planning, sentence planning,
a
discourse history, lexical choice, revision, a full-scale lexicon and
the
well-known Fuf/Surge surface realizer.” (Incidentally,
that
description was not written by a computer, but
by Charles B. Callaway and James C. Lester, the
creators of Storybook.)
Despite these
technological
advances, authors have little to fear in terms of job security, at
least where
computers are concerned. The technology
previewed in Akst's article is now already five years old and yet there
remain
authors aplenty. That
computers will one day write novels is entirely possible; whether they
will be
any good is another matter. Nevertheless, those familiar with the
old saying that a group of monkeys banging away on typewriters will
eventually produce great works of literature will enjoy taking a minute
to peruse the Monkey
Shakespeare Simulator.
|