While
critics and writers
debated about whether or not hypertext fiction would revolutionize both
the
form and content of the book, another technology slowly gained momentum
and
threatened to take both the book and hypertext fiction out of the
running. The electronic book,
or e-book,
offered readers the chance to access previously published works by
their
favourite authors in digital format. Like
the phonograph, hypertext, and a myriad of other technological
innovations, the
e-book was vested by critics with the potential to "transform society
by
revolutionizing reading, making libraries and teachers redundant, and,
finally,
ushering in a paperless society."
Despite these lofty
pronouncements, the e-book failed to accomplish much in the way of a
revolution
to depose the book. Literary luddites
attacked the e-book for similar reasons that made William Gass shun
hypertext. Hypertext critic,
Jay David Bolter, objected to
the e-book on the grounds that you can
not take
an e-book to bed with you, or read it in the bathtub,
nor could you annotate texts and, by marking
them, make them your own. In
response,
Eastgate writer Mark Bernstein argues
that these arguments are both
silly and
outmoded given that the advent of PDA's (Personal Digital Assistant)
such as
the Palm Pilot, has made reading e-books both convenient and
pleasurable: "We can easily adapt
computers to new
sizes, shapes and textures; if readers truly want the smell of leather
bindings, leather-bound laptops can be made."
Undeniably, the
adaptability
of electronic readers and low publishing costs have made e-books an
increasingly desirable alternative to print. To invest the e-book, or
hypertext
fiction, with the power to end the book, however, seems shortsighted
when there
are greater forces at work.
|